For doctors worldwide · Free

A global clinical learning network for doctors.

Join from any country. Start with 27 clearly labelled teaching examples, then contribute de-identified solved cases and compare puzzling presentations as the verified clinician corpus grows across specialties and borders.

Page reviewed

Try a teaching activity

Make your reasoning explicit before revealing the answer.

Work through a constructed clinical story, consider what does not fit, then compare your reasoning with the teaching point and sources. Free, with no account or written submission required.

Try the clinical case challenges →

One network · Local accountability

Doctors from every jurisdiction can apply

Where an official regulator supports a dependable automated check, SameCase uses it to assist review. For every other country or territory, the application follows a private, documented manual-review path against the relevant official medical authority. A missing automated connection never makes a country ineligible.

Any country

Select your listed jurisdiction, or choose Other for any country or territory not yet listed.

The right review path

Reliable register checks are used where available; a documented manual review covers every other jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction-specific

Verification confirms the submitted registration in its named jurisdiction. It is not a worldwide licence, endorsement, or guarantee of competence.

Identity and professional registration are checked separately. Registration numbers and supporting documents stay private and are never shown on public profiles.

Verified, pseudonymous by default

Your medical registration is verified privately; you choose whether cases show your name or a credentialed pseudonym. Share failures and near-misses without reputation risk.

Similar-case matching

Describe a tough presentation and compare it with the current teaching examples and future de-identified clinician contributions — always as retrieval support, never a diagnosis.

Help real patients

Privacy-reviewed, account-free patient reports can arrive in your queue. Add educational insight and differentials for them to raise with their own doctor — the human other half of the network.

Academic credit that's yours

Every case gets a permanent citable ID. Early contributors hold permanent charter status, and peer endorsements — never volume leaderboards — build your standing.

How it works

A three-step clinical case workflow

1

Verify

SameCase checks identity and the registration held in your stated jurisdiction before contributor tools unlock. A pseudonym may be public, but the account is accountable.

2

De-identify and summarize

Remove direct and combined identifiers, preserve the timeline, and show which findings changed the differential. Automated checks are only backstops.

3

Match and discuss

Retrieve potentially similar narratives, compare meaningful differences, and turn them into explicit clinical questions—not probabilities or diagnoses.

Use the templates before you contribute

Before you apply

Questions doctors often ask

Can a doctor apply from any country?

Yes. Doctors can choose their country or territory, or use the custom-jurisdiction route. SameCase uses a dependable official-register check where supported and a private, documented manual review against the relevant authority everywhere else.

What does SameCase verify?

Identity and professional registration are checked as separate steps. Registration numbers and supporting documents remain private. Both checks must be current before clinician-contributor features unlock.

Is a SameCase verification a medical licence or endorsement?

No. It confirms a submitted registration in the named jurisdiction for platform access. It is not a worldwide licence, an endorsement, or a guarantee of competence.

What can a verified doctor do on SameCase?

A currently verified clinician can use eligible case-matching and contribution tools, subject to de-identification, privacy review, and the platform's educational boundaries. SameCase does not create a doctor–patient relationship.

Clear educational boundary

Cases are de-identified and historical; patient input is educational peer perspective, never a diagnosis, prescription, or treatment order, and creates no doctor–patient relationship. The platform keeps you on the right side of that line by design.