How clinical case matching works
A practical explanation of similarity retrieval, ranking, clinical interpretation, and why a matched case is a lead for reasoning—not a diagnosis.
Read guideSameCase learning library
Practical guidance for writing, protecting, finding, and discussing clinical case narratives. Every page states its limits clearly: education and better questions, never remote diagnosis.
Contribute accountable, de-identified cases and use similarity retrieval as a disciplined aid to recall and reasoning.
A practical explanation of similarity retrieval, ranking, clinical interpretation, and why a matched case is a lead for reasoning—not a diagnosis.
Read guideA field guide for removing direct and indirect identifiers while preserving the chronology and reasoning that make a case educational.
Read guideWhat SameCase checks, why a public medical register matters, how pseudonyms work, and what the verified badge does—and does not—mean.
Read guideA concise structure for turning a de-identified presentation into a case that teaches reasoning rather than merely revealing an answer.
Read guidePrepare a clearer story and better questions for your own clinical team without mistaking an online case for a personal answer.
A patient-friendly way to organize what changed, when it changed, what affects it, and what your clinician needs to know.
Read guideHow to arrive with a clear referral question, an efficient record set, a medicine list, and a short list of decisions you need help making.
Read guideWhat a second opinion can clarify, how to transfer the right records, and how to compare two recommendations without turning disagreement into a contest.
Read guideHow to use a case match as a source of questions without mistaking narrative similarity for a personal diagnosis or treatment plan.
Read guide